Replies to post #325908 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[10452km2]

That is what it is.... It was just filed together and all parties signed for it. I dont know why everyone is making things different about the filing.

[MicroKing]

Jacked, you're correct. The filing is 2 different views on Mr. Epes testimony being omitted. Why would they file together and sign off? Now I'm really confused. It doesn't make sense. No more posting for me until I get some clarity.

[Bizreader]

That is correct. The single doc expresses opposing points of view on the request to admit Mr E's deposition taken before the first confirmation hearing in which he discusses various offers made for WMI.

At least that is how I read it.