Replies to post #24473 on Golden Triangle Ventures Inc (GTVH)

[matoutus]

It will be interesting to see the next filing ...I actually hope you are right ...but I seriously doubt it ....

[jbsliverer]

Great job again BB. I'm sure most can appreciate the diligence, patience, and accuracy of your statements that are clearly backed up by the references to the companies own numbers and dates involved. Nice to have it all laid out though and explained with links and data to back it up.

It's just the way these pinks work, some worse than others, BNPD is no different. When there is no cash, no assets, and financing is needed, the result is in dilution of shares and mostly it is never an "only minimal amount" type statement.

But again nice to have it all added up the way you have correctly done. Good job.

[pumper_stumper]

Thanks for taking the time to set the board straight on this BB.

Your well thought out post should help others that do not understand the filing. You have addressed the concerns presented to you in facts which are directly from the filing, supporting your correct analysis, instead of just blinding stating baseless opinion.

I especially note the use of June 1 as the date of the balance sheet, which would conveniently be just before the conversion/dilution. How typically "pink" of them to do such a thing!

I appreciate the time you spent on this for us!

[tolozo]

Thanks for shedding more light here since this is what I have always suspected in spite of repeated efforts to suggest that there is NO CD. One has to wonder why the repeated and rather transparent efforts to obfuscate and keep investors in the dark about the true facts regarding the co operations and finances. Hmmm.