Replies to post #236465 on Green Energy Enterprises Inc. (GYOG)

[Jim01]

QASP's faux ceo has you fishing again, Kwanie?



LMAO!

[unusable61]

If there will be no PP or exchange, why are you here arguing that it won't happen? What are you getting out to trying to talk QSAP shareholders into selling their shares? If the exchange isn't happening, why wouldn't James simply say so? Why are you trying so hard to advocate for Joe's position? How much is Joe paying you? Finally, why do you focus on the alternate theory of Jeff's claim and ignore the larger question, are the preferred A's valid? What if the judge find that they aren't, and Jeff was improperly removed?

Lot's of questions, I don't expect you to answer. Just food for thought.

Finally, leaking deposition is the act of the losing side, trying to get something prior to the court date. Doesn't seem like someone who is confident in their case would do something as underhanded, unethical and just plan stupid as that.

LOL all the way to the bank.

[Britpack]

Did I touch a nerve KDS? I don't need to be an insider to refute you - your claims are pure opinion and speculation - You do not know how the courts will rule, nor do know what the plans of the Executives or BOD of Centacom, so to refute your statements is very easy to do I could quite easily state the complete opposite of what you are saying and claim it to be fact, but it would not change the fact that it simply isn't.

By the way, no one has yet to produce proof that there is a real exchange i.e Private Placement taking place, no one has yet to produce proof that an Exchange isn't taking place - you just saying so doesn't make it proof! As for your statements to be true, I am still scratching my head on that one, and again I apologize if I missed something, but nothing springs to mind.

1. So you are an insider, thanks for sharing - how much involvement did you have in the formulation of this so called "mess"? Are you sure that the plan formulated by this so called "mess" is actually what is being carried out today as it would seem your very much on the outside now and backing a different horse.

2. I am very smart, thank you for noticing, but I believe Centacom's legal team is far far smarter than me and maybe even you. I am confident that any avenue that they may chose to pursue will be fully above board and legal in the eyes of the law and the SEC. How do we know that the restricted shares where not actually put aside for the Exchange - we don't so don't speculate - you are merely making assumptions.

3. Well it is probably worth nothing in its current form and would probably cost a hell of a lot to actually clean the shell up in order to run a viable company through it. That being said, I still believe it is questionable if the creditors debt actually exists legally.

4. Again, I do not know the prosecutions case, nor do I know the defenses, you may know the prosecutions side, but I am sure your not privy to the defense, so as I stated before (and regardless of what you and Joe may think), I will defer judgement until the court has ruled!

5. Again, I have to disagree, they may have been forced down this past due to the actions of "newly self appointed BOD of QASP" but I think we both know this was not the original plan.

Again, your assumptions regarding the SS hold no ground, you have nothing to support the sale of shares into the market, if this thing has traded 100k shares since the merger I would be surprised, and lets face it, they went public for a reason, there is a possibility they will sell shares in the future to invest further in the company, but I highly doubt they will sell like Dean or the T**I management have. That of course is my opinion and I as you have every right to speculate!

As you clearly ignored my questions, I will ask you again:

Why is Mr. Digenova listed as the CEO of QASP in the MOU you prepared in April? Equally why was he invited to a behind closed doors shareholder meeting as the CEO of QASP at the end of april or beginning of May (I forget)? And why did YOU personally refer to Jeff and Josh as the only 2 board members of QASP when discussing QASP affairs that same day of the board meeting when you answered the call in number?

[Britpack]

I, referred to Jeff and Josh as being the only board members of Quasar, because this was true during the time frame referenced in that call.

That call was at the end of April or beginning of May, Jeff had supposedly been voted out by Scott Martin and Josh Henderson in January - that just does not make any sense.

As for you question, one can only assume because it was a private offering between NHSH and Quasar shareholder, not the company itself. But that is merely my opinion.

That said, how is voting in a new BOD and filing changes to the share structure, thus effecting a change in the capitalization of the Company supposed to be considered "Normal business practices" I guess it depends on whose version of normal business practices you adhere to!

[Sharktnk]

All, you and others have been successful at is bashing as a measure to refute my claims, and performing cross board antics to discredit me( thanks for the entertainment).

Don't flater yourself, it's really effortless ...

I, intentionally leaked portions of the court outcome because I was ask to. The statements are there take them as you choose. Enlighten me please, and please explain to me how I am talking out of the side of my neck.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=63120805

[decouverte d Elbe]

I refute you. You claim to be an insider. If you were you wouldn't post here. That could land you in the slammer.
You are just someone that has a little knowledge of the situation, because you are aligned with Joe Canouse and Dean Bradley. Your business is selling shares for companies. You hope to do so here. But the problem is that you can't do that for Joe's benefit. The judge would perhaps allow it for QASP's benefit, but only because the placement is soon, and the ruling on this shell hasn't been decided. And the judge would want accurate accounting,so therefore any new shares cannot be sold for Joe's personal benefit. Because the court is also looking into Joe Canouse's role in the missing $10 million. So the judge is looking out for the shareholder's interests during the current process. You can bet on that.
Read you like a book Kwan. You contradict yourself too many times, and you haven't proven anything you've said.
So you came here to save the investors, and to convince them to sell for a fraction of their investment, or to urge them not to place their shares? Which one is it? I think the cutoff date has already passed for being eligible to place newly bought shares, but perhaps any shares of QASP sold into the market after this May 18th cutoff date, and prior to dilution, are still valuable and can in fact be exchanged , or placed with Centacomm.
That's why i am thinking of doubling my position tomorrow. Before the dilution, buying shares of the current 1.5 billion, may still be valuable, and eligible for the placement. i don't know, but maybe so.

[creapingman]

Great fantastic post as always KDS!! You true knowledge and insight are overwhelming. One bothersome thing though:

"Are you an insider Britpack to refute me."

Does this statement made by you, imply that you are an insider? And as such are releasing material events and documents pertinent to the daily function and on going litigations of QASP? For some reason, I was under the impression this type of thing was illegal. HHMMM oh well, great post and info as always, and please don't stop with all the quality DD you are providing. TY

The truth will set us free!

[gattes12]

kds that pretty much sums it up.

IF any post should be stickied its this one IMO.

[Investman432]

What is Kwan's relationship with Canouse and other members of the Atlanta pink sheet world like Robert Fowler?

[Porgie Tirebiter]

Quasar was foreign to Centacom and vice versa until I made the connection.

Please square that statement up with this post made on this board 5 years ago mentioning Dr, John England and AI Tech:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=9954043

And this post mentioning Mr. Joe Stingone:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=9954048