Did I touch a nerve KDS? I don't need to be an insider to refute you - your claims are pure opinion and speculation - You do not know how the courts will rule, nor do know what the plans of the Executives or BOD of Centacom, so to refute your statements is very easy to do I could quite easily state the complete opposite of what you are saying and claim it to be fact, but it would not change the fact that it simply isn't.
By the way, no one has yet to produce proof that there is a real exchange i.e Private Placement taking place, no one has yet to produce proof that an Exchange isn't taking place - you just saying so doesn't make it proof! As for your statements to be true, I am still scratching my head on that one, and again I apologize if I missed something, but nothing springs to mind.
1. So you are an insider, thanks for sharing - how much involvement did you have in the formulation of this so called "mess"? Are you sure that the plan formulated by this so called "mess" is actually what is being carried out today as it would seem your very much on the outside now and backing a different horse.
2. I am very smart, thank you for noticing, but I believe Centacom's legal team is far far smarter than me and maybe even you. I am confident that any avenue that they may chose to pursue will be fully above board and legal in the eyes of the law and the SEC. How do we know that the restricted shares where not actually put aside for the Exchange - we don't so don't speculate - you are merely making assumptions.
3. Well it is probably worth nothing in its current form and would probably cost a hell of a lot to actually clean the shell up in order to run a viable company through it. That being said, I still believe it is questionable if the creditors debt actually exists legally.
4. Again, I do not know the prosecutions case, nor do I know the defenses, you may know the prosecutions side, but I am sure your not privy to the defense, so as I stated before (and regardless of what you and Joe may think), I will defer judgement until the court has ruled!
5. Again, I have to disagree, they may have been forced down this past due to the actions of "newly self appointed BOD of QASP" but I think we both know this was not the original plan.
Again, your assumptions regarding the SS hold no ground, you have nothing to support the sale of shares into the market, if this thing has traded 100k shares since the merger I would be surprised, and lets face it, they went public for a reason, there is a possibility they will sell shares in the future to invest further in the company, but I highly doubt they will sell like Dean or the T**I management have. That of course is my opinion and I as you have every right to speculate!
As you clearly ignored my questions, I will ask you again:
Why is Mr. Digenova listed as the CEO of QASP in the MOU you prepared in April? Equally why was he invited to a behind closed doors shareholder meeting as the CEO of QASP at the end of april or beginning of May (I forget)? And why did YOU personally refer to Jeff and Josh as the only 2 board members of QASP when discussing QASP affairs that same day of the board meeting when you answered the call in number?
Everything I post is in my own opinion. Do not buy or sell securities based on what I post, always do your own DD.
AI
