InvestorsHub Logo

chiefwiggim24

05/21/11 11:54 PM

#236062 RE: joecanouse #236061

Again I have read the depo that is why I have kindly asked her to reread the depot. but I can NOT and will not call him guilty until it is proven and the lord knows I am not the one to do that..LOL
JMHO

Time To Roll

05/22/11 12:01 AM

#236063 RE: joecanouse #236061

Everyone with shares in QASP should be alarmed that you post on this message board.

MarketGeometry

05/22/11 12:13 AM

#236069 RE: joecanouse #236061

why is Mr bradley not on trial? He caused all the problems. And this is like lightenting strike twice
on the same stock. Randy & cunningham strike 1 , Bradley strike 2. Why would anyone invest here?

BLTN

05/22/11 12:51 AM

#236084 RE: joecanouse #236061

With all due respect, your logic fails badly here. You assert that Mr. DiGenova:

gave ms 89.5k while letting quasar lose 350k worth of planes they only owed 90k on



Was that HIS money or QASP's? If it was his, why on Earth would he give HIS own money to a company that can't account for in excess of $10 million? To me, that's incomprehensible to think any SANE person would have given their own money to a company in such disarray or with people involved who can't be trusted.

As well, you state that Mr. DiGenova:

instigated investigations, instead of just cleaning up internally, against quasar w. sec, fbi, attorney generals office.



Again, I will say that to me, it is incomprehensible that anyone with interest in QASP would object to an investigation of over $10 million shareholder money unaccounted for. What am I missing here? Shareholders have been badly burned and deserve honest answers. My question is "Where HAVE the FBI AND SEC been?"

planned to let quasar "die on the vine"



This comment has been BADLY taken out of context and was NOT what was said in the deposition. It's simply a distortion of the truth and creates serious doubt about the people who say this. GLTA



artfink

05/22/11 9:47 AM

#236117 RE: joecanouse #236061

Joe, you're kidding right?

-tried to take control of the company via issuing himself preferred shares
And HOW is this different from YOU and DEAN thinking YOUR alleged preferreds control the company.

-dealt w. ms for himself not quasar
UM, QUASAR had $38 dollars and didn't hold up their end of the contract. Jeff was working WITH them to try and maintain a relationship to eventually benefit quasar shareholders.

-gave ms 89.5k while letting quasar lose 350k worth of planes they only owed 90k on
IF I was in the same position I would ALSO try to save the Mineseeker relationship, not a couple small plane.

-instigated investigations, instead of just cleaning up internally, against quasar w. sec, fbi, attorney generals office
He did the right thing. Those that do wrong should be brought to justice.

-planned to let quasar "die on the vine
And you say "Quasar is TOAST"

MikeHawk

05/22/11 11:36 AM

#236129 RE: joecanouse #236061

-instigated investigations, instead of just cleaning up internally, against quasar w. sec, fbi, attorney generals office



OMG, do you have any ethics whatsoever? Was Business Ethics not a requirement to graduate college? You're faulting him for doing the right thing. A statement like that, from our CEO, is fundamentally wrong on so many levels!

As a shareholder of QASP, I think you should resign immediately if you're not going to run this publicly traded company in an ethical manner.

packerfan9

05/22/11 3:18 PM

#236151 RE: joecanouse #236061

I don't think Jeff is going to stop fighting you plan that will destroy shareholders until you win in court. We will see but judge unless he rules your changing BOD or making you CEO valid Jeff is still CEO. We shall see how judge rules but IMO Jeff plans to fight you until judge rules who is CEO.