InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

alsteps

05/10/11 4:25 PM

#7662 RE: beentomyrasite #7661

I was thinking the same, however no management communication is a killer on the stock
icon url

KELLYCO

05/10/11 4:41 PM

#7664 RE: beentomyrasite #7661

They have never produced anything yet.
Why should they change their strategy?
They sell shares to suckers and that is their business model.
icon url

my2Mustangs

05/10/11 4:55 PM

#7665 RE: beentomyrasite #7661

They certainly can and do take salaries like that and all I have ever seen them produce is more PRs, more "news alerts" and more shares. The majority has voted Gary and Sharon their pay and there's nothing the shareholders can do about it.

Were you asked to vote on the A/S increase? The answer is NO.
Were you asked to vote on their pay? The answer is NO.
Were you asked if you wanted to renew their contract. I'm sure the answer is NO.
They set pharmaCON up the same way. When Gary started running out of shares to sell, the majority(he and Sharon) would raise the A/S. 3 times in 6 months they raised the A/S. From 3B to 20B I believe from Jan. through June in 2009. It's on the Nevada Secretary of State's site under the "amendments" at the bottom of the page. If you can't find it let me know and I'll do a link or a cut and paste.

By the way, shareholders can't fire Gary and Sharon either because Gary and Sharon maintain voting control here just like at pharmaCON. All shareholders of INOL can do is wait for Gary and Sharon to walk away, just like they did at pharmaCON.