InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 96
Posts 9115
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/11/2011

Re: beentomyrasite post# 7661

Tuesday, 05/10/2011 4:55:37 PM

Tuesday, May 10, 2011 4:55:37 PM

Post# of 20669
They certainly can and do take salaries like that and all I have ever seen them produce is more PRs, more "news alerts" and more shares. The majority has voted Gary and Sharon their pay and there's nothing the shareholders can do about it.

Were you asked to vote on the A/S increase? The answer is NO.
Were you asked to vote on their pay? The answer is NO.
Were you asked if you wanted to renew their contract. I'm sure the answer is NO.
They set pharmaCON up the same way. When Gary started running out of shares to sell, the majority(he and Sharon) would raise the A/S. 3 times in 6 months they raised the A/S. From 3B to 20B I believe from Jan. through June in 2009. It's on the Nevada Secretary of State's site under the "amendments" at the bottom of the page. If you can't find it let me know and I'll do a link or a cut and paste.

By the way, shareholders can't fire Gary and Sharon either because Gary and Sharon maintain voting control here just like at pharmaCON. All shareholders of INOL can do is wait for Gary and Sharon to walk away, just like they did at pharmaCON.