I think you hit the nail on the head, daisy. I believe the judge is not really an adversary to equity, but has been thinking in terms of the "greater good", hence her striking comments about JPM in her GSA ruling. I don't agree with this philosophy because I actually think the greater good suffers more in this instance. By not holding any bank accountable for its actions, what incentive does it have to make changes? None. And that's why our financial system will continue to be screwed over the years to come.