Replies to post #35996 on Medinah Minerals (MDMN)

[dcbass]

Good post easy. We wait.... It's a shame it has taken this long but I continue to hold a nice position, because when the funding hits this will be a rocket. It's not really the easiest million but I'll take it!

[CoreSample]

Followed the company for better part of 5 years, but haven’t followed rumors as facts. Why do you?

Good point. I put words in your mouth, attributing silliness from others as if you were on board. My bad, and I retract, and regret my indiscretion.

I do own the stock, so not a hypothetical I could readily answer.

Poor point. This is discussion, so all we have is rhetoric. If you are so firmly fixed in a mindset that you can't imagine how someone not invested in MDMN could possibly perceive this outfit, then why in the world do you engage me?

I don’t consider Les’s record a whitewash, especially when he was later targeted as part of an FBI sting and acquitted.

You missed the point. I was referring to others who are whitewashing the fraud, theft, and breach of fiduciary duty Les consummated over widows who trusted him. And I would LOVE to hear the logic of how being nabbed, then acquitted in a sting somehow makes him look good. In Bermuda Shorts, Les was absolutely on board with using Swiss bank accounts to launder a kickback to an investor (the FBI). Les had clever attorneys on board who used Medinah as a red herring to slow prosecutors-- he said "prove the mountain is worthless". Risky, but given the number of defendants that were involved in the case the FBI basically assumed the jury would see through it and they were wrong. Admirable tactics, for sure, but nothing commending his behavior or character, equally for sure.

I have read the accounts of what transpired 30+ years ago, and believe he did what was necessary to protect a stock company.

Please share with me where forgery, theft, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty while serving as agent for widows somehow demonstrates justifiable behavior?!? I've linked the entire appellate case and am eager for you to share with me examples of how Les, who was too embarrassed to even DEFEND his own actions, wasn't guilty of anything other than scandalous (in the words of the JUDGE) behavior.

I'll remind you the Huff/Donnelly case was a CIVIL litigation regarding Les’s company, “CUMO” Resources.

I'll once again gently remind you the case was titled "HUFF V. PRICE". Cumo was not the defendant, nor a party to the lawsuit. Les (and his buddy, and his poor wife, who he brought in without her knowledge of the fraud and malfeasance, were).
Do tell, why is it so relevant that a court find you guilty of fraud, theft, and breach of fid. duty in a civil case is, in essence, any different from a criminal case? Courts don't recklessly bandy about terms like "fraud", "theft", and "scandalous", you know. Public authorities are hardly party and arbiter of all private transactions.

The stock in question, as you already know, was clearly being hammered by MM’s naked shorts, and there was no other avenue available to fight the short attack

What? That justifies THEFT from unrelated parties who entrusted Les as AGENT??!? I'll give you an opportunity to rethink this. I'd like to believe you really don't think that it is fine to rob an innocent third party because you fear "evil shorty" is the reason your company is floundering. You do understand he also manipulated Cumo's price, don't you? In your book, does one bad turn merit two others?

He knew it was wrong, did not contest the allegations, and repaid it 10 fold or more

Oh really? Do tell. Prove this please. It should be easy. I sure haven't made any assertions I can't back up.

I find the financials illusive. They are not required at this stage of a pink

So you don't mind digesting Excel spreadsheets that don't even balance and certainly are not "financial statements" that pretend to be such? Man, I admire your innocent and generous spirit!

Yes, definitely I feel something is wrong. Is there a reason to continuously use purposefully inflammatory language in posts to defame the company?

With all due respect, if you think I am bad, pay an independent and qualified forensic accountant/analyst to take a look at this, and the company sponsored info some term "DD", and you will see I'm being charitable.

Cheers, and so sorry for my run-on sentence,
~~CS~~