Core, Thanks for the "Gentle" Reminder
"SInce I took the time to answer your questions, why didn't your return the courtesy responding to the 7 very simple questions I asked you? I didn't even ask you for any type of personal disclosure??"
Ask yourself, are "banking issues", "homeland security", "hedge/mezz complexities" really reasonable reasons for what MDMN is experiencing right now, especially considering the history?
Followed the company for better part of 5 years, but haven’t followed rumors as facts. Why do you?
If you did not own stock, would you believe any of this, even for a second?
I do own the stock, so not a hypothetical I could readily answer.
Why do you think some are whitewashing Les's record?
How could there be any honorable intention behind that?
I don’t consider Les’s record a whitewash, especially when he was later targeted as part of an FBI sting and acquitted. I have read the accounts of what transpired 30+ years ago, and believe he did what was necessary to protect a stock company. I'll remind you the Huff/Donnelly case was a CIVIL litigation regarding Les’s company, “CUMO” Resources. The stock ended up going from $0.65 to $39.70. He did not contest the court case and repaid the plantiffs for his wrong doing. He knew it was wrong, did not contest the allegations, and repaid it 10 fold or more. The stock in question, as you already know, was clearly being hammered by MM’s naked shorts, and there was no other avenue available to fight the short attack. Again, Les did not contest the allegations, and more than “made whole” the plantiffs in the case. I consider the Les of today older, but wiser, and not likely to repeat mistakes of his youth. Again, I do not follow the rumors, only facts.
Why do you think the company delivers financials that by any ascertainable standard, equate to complete garbage?
I find the financials illusive. They are not required at this stage of a pink.
Why do you think the the PRs and Q&As are so clownish, pretending that translation errors are behind the meaningless opaqueness?
Actually, I find you are being needlessly petty in your constant assertions that are more than open to interpretation to investors.
When you read something as insipid as "Company Management has today received written documentation that the first tranche of funds, necessary to complete the initial catalyst part of the Joint Venture Agreement, are finally in the last stage of transfer to the Company bank account. Management will continue to monitor the funding process, on a daily basis, until we can affirm and report that the Company is in verified possession of funds received from our Joint Venture Agreement partners" don't you feel that something "just isn't right"?
Aside from your run-on sentence, Yes, definitely I feel something is wrong. Is there a reason to continuously use purposefully inflammatory language in posts to defame the company? It is frustrating for investors having to wait for the announcement of the tranche, and release of the JV news. It is not very frustrating for those with no position. Regardless of what the company does not do, what the company does, or says, the main factor here is what the mountain contains and when will the company finally deliver. As you are aware, there is a very clear statement by the company that they are under an NDA. They have also clearly stated they have a signed JV. Time will tell. Will you be buying when the announcement comes?
Invested in the Mountain…
And that’s what counts!
Easy
