InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

platero

04/07/11 10:13 AM

#22143 RE: robhere #22137

They're creating suspicion and doubts where none is needed. Its obvious that certain legal and bureaucratic steps had to be taken before being able to make a doctor's note public. This documentation is one more step in the right direction.
icon url

SNJgrower

04/07/11 10:13 AM

#22144 RE: robhere #22137

The surgeons name is blacked out so, they didn't get permission.
icon url

Austinvball

04/07/11 10:18 AM

#22147 RE: robhere #22137

A name would have been nice. Anonymity allows false claims without recourse. Someone owning up to this claim would give it credibility.

Also, this does not prove that the extracts cured the cancer, the FDA trials will do that. This proves that there is no cancer present in that area after applying the extract. It is a subtle difference...

Having said that, I like this document. I think CBIS gave us everything they could without violating the patient or the physician. This is all we are going to get for now...the next step is preparing for trials.