InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,567.19
(
1.06%
)
US TECH 100
19,828.00
(
0.95%
)
Dow Jones
39,375.87
(
0.17%
)
Brent Oil
86.78
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
57,364.50
(
-1.61%
)
Post# of 129051
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Austinvball

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 24
Posts 3418
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/04/2011

Austinvball

Re: robhere post# 22137

Thursday, 04/07/2011 10:18:49 AM

Thursday, April 07, 2011 10:18:49 AM

Post# of 129051
A name would have been nice. Anonymity allows false claims without recourse. Someone owning up to this claim would give it credibility.

Also, this does not prove that the extracts cured the cancer, the FDA trials will do that. This proves that there is no cancer present in that area after applying the extract. It is a subtle difference...

Having said that, I like this document. I think CBIS gave us everything they could without violating the patient or the physician. This is all we are going to get for now...the next step is preparing for trials.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up