Replies to post #271250 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[Reptile]

"Yes, she ruled on presented facts - so the EC needs new facts to change her mind, but imo the EC doesn't have new facts, otherwise they would have presented them already to the examiner or at the confirmation hearing!"

Why don't you tell us just what those presented facts were.

As I remember, the only thing presented was what WMI and Rosen told her, no evidence, documents or testimony to back up any of those facts.

[Jestiron]

S&G wants this to go to into litigation. While it seems that JMW does not wish it to go there, Susman excels in the courtroom during litigations. I think you are incorrect about the EC and "new facts" simply because, in my opinion, it would be foolish of the EC to "present them" to the examiner or at the confirmation hearing. S&G expected a conflict between the Solomon numbers and the examiners numbers which is why those were not offered to the court, then having seen the putrid examiners report, I find it probable that S&G and the EC made the decision to hold back what ammo and facts they could for later use.

Have a great Sunday,
-Jest