Replies to post #83971 on Plastic2Oil Inc (PTOI)

[5dollars]

Do you know if P20 only needs one patent, or will they need several. Did they file one for say the catalyst and are now filling for the machine. I don't know. Please help us understand.

[Rawnoc]

The best we can do is find a PR from a year and a half ago that had a poorly written headline?

I'd say they don't "keep" doing stuff like that. In fact, I find it comical the accusations against the oompany for hype pump dump scam etc. when prior to last week they only had ONE press release about P2O in 9 months and it was about the results of the stack test.

I'd say, IMO, the company is in full blown under promise and over deliver and has been. I mean, seriously, some of you skeptics have made a good point about the silence from the company. You can't at the same time accuse it of being a hype scam over ONE single PR in 9 months prior to getting full blown commercial production.

A lot of us have had to call the DEC and dig through SEC filings to find tons of really good PR-worthy info that the company stayed otherwise silent about. So I think they are a far cry from "keep pulling stuff like this" whatever "stuff" you are referring to. You have to admit -- the company is acting very professionally, maybe too professionally. It's clear that anything they put out for the public to feast on is 100% accurate, and you can take it to the bank since they rarely do so unless the info is undeniable (like the stack test results and the other PRs that have begun).

JBII will never go anyways as long as they keep pulling stuff like this.

[PaperProphet]

Exactly. It's not hard to write a press release to be unambiguous. It was written that way on purpose. But even "is filing" isn't the same as Rawnoc's claimed "will file."

And we could certainly go over the semantics all day--like what does "commenced commercial operations" really mean. It won't do any good as long as the CEO tries to be vague and suggestive in his communications.

.