InvestorsHub Logo

tradinguru

12/20/10 11:36 AM

#47634 RE: MrLong #47633

I cant see this being the case at all. If Dr. Geoff had a confidentiality agreement, CCEL would have sued him and CBAI a long time ago.

Dew

12/20/10 11:37 AM

#47635 RE: MrLong #47633

That's been a while so I doubt it has anything to do with that. But it's hard to figure out exactly what they are suing for until they come out of hiding. I'm really surprised they didn't come out with anything yet to explain the move to their shareholders. Strange.

And send a PM to a Admin and ask for your posts to be reinstated. I did and they gave me back full status. I'm sure they would with you also.

no_whammys

12/20/10 9:12 PM

#47731 RE: MrLong #47633

I'm not disagreeing with you at all but you'd think with all the brains in CBAI that someone, especially Dr. O'Neill, would've thought of a termination agreement or intellectual property clause between Dr. O'Neill & CCEL before they entered into the LOI. Even if it's a copyright infringment type complaint with U-Cord & Afford-A-Cord, wouldn't CCEL have gone after CBAI when Afford-A-Cord was first announced rather than wait until CCEL was caught with their pants down? Like all the rest here, I don't know. Sounds more like what Booger's post (47625) eluded to....CCEL telling CBAI "that's our license and you have to pay us or we'll take our ball and go home". Matt's gonna say big f'in deal, we have a bigger ball, get the hell off the field. As you've all said already, who knows.
Edit: I see what I just said has already been posted. That's what I get for not reading further before I put my beer down to type.