In America you can sue for anything. It doesn't mean it has merit. Unless "We" are privy to binding contract language by former employers-to-their-scientists; then we can't make a call on what is considered intellectual property. It depends on Dr. Geoff's contract with CCEL at the time of employment and the caveat; termination clause language. He's an important dude to the stem cell community. He didn't flip burgers he invents, creates, promotes science. Did he create something that reverts to CCEL's ownership? idk, more information is needed.
Because he works for CBAI who do you sue? Person, company or both? Both is standard practice; CBAI et al. This might be an intellectual property type of litigation; "Trade Secrets". We need more information.
Last post of the day because of my imposed 3 ban limit. Another possible angle the litigants could pursue may involve Dr. Geoff O'Neill. Past Cryo-Cell secrets holder and current CBAI employee. Maybe he created Cryo-Cell de Mexico for Cryo-Cell Int'l... idk.
Kinda like Mercedes has a two year after termination agreement clause to refrain from acting on any stem cell business that conflicts with Cryo-Cell interests. That's why I said, more information is needed.
Cryo-Cell de Mexico, the LOI transaction, likely has more to do with the former Dr. Geoff and Cryo-Cell relationship. Cryo-Cell needs leverage. That potentially could be leverage or they can attempt to muddy the water claiming he breeched a confidential agreement. Waiting for more info.
Have A Great Day...
