Replies to post #68351 on e.Digital Corporation (fka EDIG)

[CAL_LAW]

Cassie: By your command:

Dear Robert:

Rarely do I see someone post boldly that you and the company have engaged in publishing intentionally false PRs. But see this:

"Posted by: Cassandra
In reply to: jwperk who wrote msg# 68310
Date:3/8/2005 6:20:32 PM
Post #of 68333

e.Digital did not have anything to do with the prototype of the embedded digeplayer that was "unveiled" by Inflight Canada at WAEA so e.Digital's PR was false and misleading.

I don't know what e.Digital's role might be with the model that Wencor went on to develop without Inflight Canada and that Boyer displayed today. I certainly don't accept Putnam's assurance they are actively "working with" Wencor on it.

There is no reason not to let shareholders know what revenue-producing role e.Digital will have. NRE fees? Manufacturing? None?

It's hard to believe that shareholder's continue to fall for Putnam's ambiguous statements that are nothing but innuendo.

~Cassandra"


Was e.Digital's PR "false and misleading?" or was that a patently false statement of fact and a direct attack on the company and management?


If so, as a shareholder, I respectfully demand that you initiate necessary action.


Please advise.