Replies to post #244433 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[7nech]

#244389   http://www.rankia.com/foros/bolsa/temas/269650-washington-mutual-demanda-fdic-po 7nech 10/24/2010 9:23:41 AM

[Yanik]

Im good with seeing the bid rigging claims. The sub asset values. The ones that were FC'ed to JPM for nada. The 4 cash deposit coming back to the estate. The NOL's tax refunds going back to the estate. The potential fraud charges against Weil and specifically Hosen the snake in the grass. I agree with your thoughts on some items. Like i doubt we will see the big man JD or bair go down for this. I think that is something we might be able to go after once the EC is in the drivers seat. The Noteholders arguing against the coming shareholders motion on the 9th. It seems that some parties of lawyers fight the hardest on what they think will be losing issues and in court the judge sure did lay down the law. I guess at the very least the examiners report will show the assets and such and enable us to have a shareholders meeting/ or even better a trustee put in play to kick them out/ cram them down in one fell swoop.

AIMO of course. May justice be served even if we dont see everything we would like i expect it to be a massive step in the right direction for equity. AIMO of course again.

thoughts?

[Bizreader]

Okay. Cool. Thanks. That sheds some light on the matters at hand.

I believe some of the parties will compare notes on the phone and that will effect that PPS ... imo

[jhdf51]

Thanks Catz...great reading.

JHD

[dmceng]

WithCatz

Thank for the post and your assumptions

Take Care
David

[es1]

Catz Ar you sure about the first one

The Work Plan from the examiner states that he will provide BACK to the party that provided CONFIDENTIAL information that information ONLY, and ONLY back to the party that gave that info. Eg, they get back what they gave. Only their info. But with the Examiner's specific input on that info (presumed to be that part of the report related only to that confidential information). The period between Oct 25th and Nov 1st is to resolve what the Examiner thinks on ONLY that confidential information, to see how to make it public, and if no resolution, that CONFIDENTIAL part would be redacted. In any case, the FULL report, unredacted does go to THJMW. And in any case, NOBODY gets to see the report in advance, and NO party gets to see anything they didn't CONFIDENTIALLY provide + the examiners input on just what they provided

I thought all parties will get the report in full NOT INCLUDING the confidential information. If WMI had confidential info released to the examiner it would not be included in anyone's report except WMI's etc.

I don't see how anyone would be able to review the documentation if they only get what they give.

The EC should be able to get any info available to all other parties. Only confidential info will be withheld

[etzetrade]

Catz, excellent points. You have a real experience in investigation or DA. You were probably working either in FBI or US Attorney.

[speculator777]

This had to irritate a lot of the pumpers. You took the horse they wanted to ride away lol. We even have a countdown in the IBOX until the report. Thank you for the realistic analysis of what to expect from the examiners report.

Spec

[drkazmd65]

Thanks again for that dollop of reality Catz.

[clawmann]

WithCatz: I'd have to say I agree with your assessment of what to expect from the Examiner's report. I think many simply don't understand what his role is.

[mehedi]

Sir, do you foresee the report being out this weekend?