RR,
You've been away for a while, if you read the last billing statement of the examiner, JH is actually asking why the seizure was not contested.
Now if WGM advised the BOD not to contest the seizure and are found to be in conflict of interests then the Examiner could actually state that the seizure and sale can be contested because of the conflicts and the Purchase and Assumption agreement has not be finalized.
Having a Trustee is not a matter of if but when.
1. The covered bonds issues.
2. The TPS securities. OTS officials are being interviewed.
3. The NOL gifting.
4. The initial value of Assets placed in receivership and sold to JPM.
5. The $4Billion deposit.
6. The ***$25Billion*** at WMBFsb.
7. The Visa Shares gifting.
8. The Wind Farm gifting.
The legal analysis from the examiner would be worth reading because he has not hired independent or forensic accountants. JH has the analysis done by PJ Solomon and the Debtors have Blackstone. Lets see if Blackstone wants to destroy its reputation by falsifying financial records.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
