InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 56
Posts 2063
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/13/2007

Re: rramirez82 post# 243391

Wednesday, 10/20/2010 5:07:37 PM

Wednesday, October 20, 2010 5:07:37 PM

Post# of 736048
RR,

You've been away for a while, if you read the last billing statement of the examiner, JH is actually asking why the seizure was not contested.

Now if WGM advised the BOD not to contest the seizure and are found to be in conflict of interests then the Examiner could actually state that the seizure and sale can be contested because of the conflicts and the Purchase and Assumption agreement has not be finalized.

Having a Trustee is not a matter of if but when.

1. The covered bonds issues.

2. The TPS securities. OTS officials are being interviewed.

3. The NOL gifting.

4. The initial value of Assets placed in receivership and sold to JPM.

5. The $4Billion deposit.

6. The ***$25Billion*** at WMBFsb.

7. The Visa Shares gifting.

8. The Wind Farm gifting.

The legal analysis from the examiner would be worth reading because he has not hired independent or forensic accountants. JH has the analysis done by PJ Solomon and the Debtors have Blackstone. Lets see if Blackstone wants to destroy its reputation by falsifying financial records.

For Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News