InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

shell3

10/09/10 11:37 PM

#35273 RE: imperativity #35272

If he's followed this since 2008 as he claims he's got some of those .001 shares, $1000 worth in 2008 would have been $380,000 @ .38 on the jump of the spill, anyone that sold at those gain would have plenty of green to pick up at .075, I don't see that much demand for BUY side of shares, I do feel that if the demand was there it would run, I bought a .06125, had order in for .0625, wouldn't fill at .0625, 20 minutes later they filled even with my order at .0625 only when they could get others to sell @ .06, I do think they want to buy back some shares, maybe there is a short side of this? I did get some at .04 a month ago and wanted some more, thought .065 was what I would have to pay when they fell alittle more
icon url

DADDY FAT SAXX

10/10/10 8:29 AM

#35274 RE: imperativity #35272

I would like to see his top 10 gainers over the years. Since he deals with pinksheets some may have changed names or do not exist anymore but I would love to see what he had predicted and what has really happened. If I picked 20 stocks even randomly I could hit a few winners now and then. My concern with Oakley is that he was paid to put out the report. His opinion could be based on the money he got from MOP too. This is my opinion so take it with a grain of salt.