Replies to post #12952 on Wanderport Corp (WDRP)

[Gold_Icon]

because WDRP left him without anything else to show with yesterdays PR were they answered all the questions been asked by him , the ones he have been asking to be passed to the company , until his request was made true, but I said yesterday that wasnt the end of it.

Remember this ???

regarding the visit request u made to WDRP...
U said

Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have asked before, where do I go? My email's asking about a visit went unanswered.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=52234876

and later because someone posted a replay to a visit request...


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I tried to go visit the people involved and did not care about any product and was given a similar hogwash response.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=52258742

regarding the timeframe u have been following WDRP...
U said


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My brother told me I had to buy some back in late Sept. I threw $1000 at it for 50,000 shares, then it just tanked . When it went up these last few days, I started to research the company.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47056990

And then when u wanted to start making the company look bad...


Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Far off?? All I said was I was following WDRP since the electric car deal.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=51032780

As yo see the statements changes everytime there is a new objetive , talks about deceiving...

[BeerIsGood]

. . . There has to be several prototypes made to begin and complete on going testing. There could not be any results from testing unless they have tested the unit as a complete unit. They might now have the final design for the housing, but that does not mean they have not made initial prototypes for the final testing that they are about to initiate.

What results are you talking about? I have not seen any PR specifying test results. Significant news of multiple prototypes being built and tested would be PRed IMO. All they talk about is product analysis which means ON PAPER. Remember the last time someone insisted UMC had units for testing then they PRed the results came from mathematical scenarios?

Final design for the housing? Final testing they are about to initiate? What PR was that mentioned in? So is this final prototype the pre-launch unit they hope to have soon or does that get built after the final prototype?

Why do the PR's need to be so vague? Most likely because they are not nearly as far along as some people think they are IMO. But don't worry, PR states: MORE ON THIS SOON.