InvestorsHub Logo

STRIKEEAGLE

07/21/10 10:35 PM

#224705 RE: rramirez82 #224699

Remember... these guys are hacks...

and I did not get the impression that they were speaking with much confidence. More of guess between two guys that knew a lot about very little... and it had very little to do with the appointment of an examiner. Rosen selects his speakers from a pool of his that has the talent to "speak" rather than "read". Beyond that... they are not convincing.

As for "control"... that's where the training comes in. Glad I have... or "soreness" would abound in some situations... the courtroom is busting at the seams with hacks that probably deserve a little nose-bending.

McMahon and Nelson are all over this case... and will include the direction / advice / selection of someone who will get the job done!

Looking forward to talking about the "arts" with you ... in Vegas.

AIMHO

Bizreader

07/21/10 10:50 PM

#224711 RE: rramirez82 #224699

RR, "The government" isn't really at stake here or it's reputation. If anything, Democrats could take credit for seeing to it that common share holders got paid eventually. That is in line with their platform.

Also, the White House is not covering for Sheila or Jamie or the OTS or anyone involved. It could be said that a win for equity is a win for the White House solely on the grounds that the those in the previous administration, OTS, FDIC and the current management of JP Morgan Chase all lost one of the final battles of the "financial reformation".

Just some thoughts.