InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ryanmnly

06/29/10 6:22 PM

#140010 RE: Toxic Avenger #140009

That's where you disagree with most who are here. You believe there is no large naked short position. We believe there is. Everything that follows that difference in opinion is completely meaningless. Let's leave it at that.
icon url

LoneGrey

06/29/10 6:24 PM

#140011 RE: Toxic Avenger #140009

kezzek I was hoping you could give us some insight on how hedgefunds and MMs work in a situation here like we have with CDIV. But to answer the questions using 350k shares short (which we all know is nothing) doesn't really answer the question at all. The question is with 50 million shares short. A hypothetical question which could be a reality in a stock.
icon url

Ninja7

06/29/10 6:32 PM

#140016 RE: Toxic Avenger #140009

My last reply...and then you're welcome to the last word...:-)

The problem IMHO is that they do not go short for any length of time.



My MM friend would disagree with your statement. He claimed that MM's often held positions (short and long) for months and even years.

And the finra monthly short numbers do not reflect any naked shorts (and neither do the daily numbers). IMHO, they really don't give much insight into what the situation is with CDIV and the FLD.

Like you said, you can either believe in the FLD concept or not and act accordingly.