InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bizreader

06/10/10 4:41 PM

#209329 RE: rickszy #209328

I'm going to need ramirez or mordicai or someone in law to tell me about this filing.

icon url

knick

06/10/10 4:59 PM

#209343 RE: rickszy #209328

You finally posted a short one.lol
icon url

Lawrence 147

06/10/10 5:08 PM

#209346 RE: rickszy #209328

Looks like they are trying to overload the court with useless research and tell them look how much has been put into this. In fact it can be turned on them very easily and show how much they have padded the bill. A very poor move in my opinion.
icon url

knick

06/10/10 5:11 PM

#209348 RE: rickszy #209328

Does'nt seem to hold much weight from the little I read.Just rehashing how much expence for something thats been investigated b4.
icon url

ABIGIDIOT

06/10/10 5:39 PM

#209354 RE: rickszy #209328

What in the Sam Hill is that???? seems like a bona fide record of how they exasperated us at each and every turn !!!!!!!!!!

perhaps judge Mary will look at this as what it truly is: just a big old ugly reiteration of what has been !!!!
icon url

SlyOne

06/10/10 5:45 PM

#209355 RE: rickszy #209328

Someone, anyone understand this filing:

Seems like Rosen is trying to antagonize JMW? Does Rosen think they control the process over and above the judge?
icon url

xoom

06/10/10 6:14 PM

#209367 RE: rickszy #209328

So are we expecting a Counter-Counter-Statement of Issue and Counter-Counter-Designation of Record on Appeal from the EC now ?

lol

icon url

hestheman

06/11/10 8:51 AM

#209576 RE: rickszy #209328

Rosen has become such a pain in the arse it is'nt even funny anymore. I hope these bastages have to return every penny they've milked out of this case for doing nothing more than trying to steal the company from it's rightful owners (equity).