There is something else on this. If there is illegal naked shorting from the MM. Then this one is not playing a roll in this matter. Why... because the stock NNOS is supposedly naked short back in de month of 2004 till the summer of 2004 (I quess). How can the "new rule" have any effect. There is simply no reason for the MM to cover. Or am I wrong? Maybe someone on this board can explain this. I really don't no.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
