InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,464.62
(
-0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,220.00
(
-0.20%
)
Dow Jones
39,150.33
(
0.04%
)
Brent Oil
84.39
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
64,270.08
(
0.28%
)
Post# of 4551
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Bullseye104

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 28
Posts 3175
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/30/2004

Bullseye104

Re: brokerdown post# 2920

Monday, 01/03/2005 2:47:46 PM

Monday, January 03, 2005 2:47:46 PM

Post# of 4551
There is something else on this. If there is illegal naked shorting from the MM. Then this one is not playing a roll in this matter. Why... because the stock NNOS is supposedly naked short back in de month of 2004 till the summer of 2004 (I quess). How can the "new rule" have any effect. There is simply no reason for the MM to cover. Or am I wrong? Maybe someone on this board can explain this. I really don't no.





For get my English I'm Hollands

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up