InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

vg_future

12/31/04 5:33 PM

#88729 RE: rmarchma #88726

rmarchma, thanks for the response. I haven't seen anymore F4s today (that's great after what has happened today)...so, I am waiting for a better start next week

Happy New Year You.

-vg_future
icon url

sinnet14

12/31/04 6:31 PM

#88738 RE: rmarchma #88726

rmarchma, why you think that the options Rip exercised in 2004 could have been exercised into 2005? If he can't and have to exercise in 2004, then he has to pay tax for the gains associated with it.
icon url

davids

01/01/05 12:26 PM

#88757 RE: rmarchma #88726

"One of the basic income tax planning concepts is to defer income into the next tax year if possible. "

My understanding of the tax law is that the larger one's income, the larger one's tax bill is as a percent. Accordingly, spreading income over several years can be more desirable often times than having a large income in one year. Also, more years allows more deductions to offset the income. Sure, Rip could have easily pushed this transaction into 2005, and thereby defered it to the following year. However, if he, like me, is expecting even larger gains and income in '05 than in '04, he may be better off splitting his gains over two years than combining them in '05.