InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

nwsun

04/25/10 6:10 PM

#130280 RE: kruy #130279

Kruy, why can't or won't the SEC investigate the naked short angle here? or can they hide behind the counterfiet shares and say its not possible to prove nns? there's more to this mess than megas's lack of fiduciary responsibility to his publicly traded company.., but it keeps being avoided.. someone needs to have all issues related to this mess responded to.. not just pino/pammy's role and outcome and megas failure to file timely... how do we get the other angles responded to in particular the naked shares issue sold by the brokerages who never halted the stock and hie behind the dtcc lock? why cant mary step on that issue a little ?
icon url

turn2him

04/26/10 11:59 AM

#130286 RE: kruy #130279

That appears to be the game here. Drag this thing out long enough so that people forget. As TM stated, time is his friend.
icon url

Arkait

04/26/10 12:51 PM

#130291 RE: kruy #130279

Yeah, one has to really worry about the SEC, these days, in case they come up from a session of porn
and actually perform. Three years before Pamela
was indicted. And yet, she is still in business.
The SEC needs to have its heads handed to them,
and communication with them over their rules and threats are all bs.

One doesn't "communicate" with criminals, one sues them.imho.