InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

blademan

03/18/10 10:46 AM

#24701 RE: patchman #24697


PR says "over 2mil". That could be 2.5mil to 3.5mil??

Good questions Pman! That is why I vote for you to find out since you are so troubled by this information and report back! I'm sure we'll all appreciate it!

Mountains and mole hills, Tomato TOmato!! Peanuts IMO, but I wouldn't want you to lose any sleep over it, and I'm confident the board will appreciate it so you let us know what you find!!

And March was a conservative $2 Million. This is an indication the value decreased. In dollar value the difference between $2 Million and $4 Million may not sound like much but it is a delta of 50%. And when you look at the revenues reported by BEDA (unaudited) it is substantial.

Would you question a PR by Company XYZ that priced a deal once at $100 Billion at first and as it got closer to closing had defined it as $50 Billion? If so, why not question it here.

Why can't BEDA stick to a value for this acquisition? Yes $4 Million is greater than $2 Million so technically they are covered but so is $100 Million and does anybody here value this at $100 Million?