Replies to post #54595 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[fourkids_9pets]

as always gambler .. great post

you echo my sentiments to a T

--
4kids
all jmo

[Renee]

Another fine , well reasoned post , Gambler , as was your post yesterday .

And THANK YOU for your support in keeping this board task oriented on relevant matters to EXPH .

Renee

[xray44b9]

Gambler-if EXPH actually makes 9-11 million in revs in 2010 their PPS is going to be a heck of a lot higher than .009-.0011. I know you're being conservative though and thats fine, especially given that we really don't know if he'll hit those numbers.

[99leadballoons]

Great post Gambler.

I especially like this part...

"Now you can take all of this to heart or go back to reading the "naysayers" propaganda."

I agree. People should only listen to the CEO, Mr. JD Brown. If they go by past PR results, which can be found here...http://www.marketwire.com/mw/search.do?action=next¤tPage=4¶ms=expo%20holdings&grpSearch=C&companyid=31249&lastDateTime=2008-05-21%2013:45:00&lastReleaseId=859597

or past financial filing results which can be found at pinksheets.com they are doing themselves a huge disservice.

Expo's future performance is only based on what the CEO says. It has nothing to do with their past accomplishments. Numbers like 300k for 2nd qtr this year have no bearing on any yearly predictions.

I have emailed with the CEO and he assures me that the 6 million prediction for this year is intact. How much more proof do people need than the word of a Pinky CEO? Now I know what people are thinking. They are like "Dude. Springroll, don't you understand that Pinky CEO's have a long history of being dishonest?"

I laugh at these kinds of comments because I know JD Brown is a man of almost Abe Lincoln type integrity. Now I know some people are thinking "Dude, Springroll, Havent you read all of the past predictions from JD himself that didnt come true?"

I of course laugh at these too because I know from reading the email that JD stated very clearly to me when I asked him about 2009 sales and he answered me clearly..."We stand behind our previous sales projections"

Now why would JD stand behind their projections if they werent true?

Just remember anything that you read that says something different than what JD says is propaganda. I dont believe any of the numerous links out there that point out times when JD has said things that didnt come true. I ignore the PRs that state changing common to preferred was better for shareholders, only listen to the later one that says changing from preferred to common was better. I dont pay any attention to SEC filings that show Malone as not being a 10% shareholder, I only pay attention to JD saying no insiders have sold. I ONLY trust links that point to things JD has predicted for the future. Expo's past performance is irrelevant only what the CEO has predicted for the future, like 100 million in revenues!!!

It is absolutely ridiculous that people dont call the CEO to ask for clarification on everything.

For example when I was concerned that the O/S had gone up to 992 million and I emailed the CEO and asked JD Why did the share count go up from 980million to 992 million recently?

He showed me the error of my ways when he replied to me
"Correction, the share count has increased from 990ish to 992ish (millions).We have recently issued approx 2Million shares when the price exceeded .03."

I could have sworn the CC said the O/S was 980 million and that my calls to the TA confirmed this, but luckily I emailed JD and he cleared it up for me and told me I was wrong. If I had not emailed him and aksed, I would have mistakenly believed the CC or the TA and I would have thought that they actually sold 12 million shares into the run up.

All IMHSO.

[Lurker from Mars]

"I for one am betting on "ETC" and the "divy" to create demand for EXPH. If EXPH can do the 9-11 million in 2010 that shd give EXPH a pps of .009-.011 without "ETC"."


Wow...basically what I have been saying for almost 6 months now...pps equal to guidance and ETC is the reason given to buy ETC....but I'm the bad guy....

SO, what happens after the divy? EXPH crashes cuz IF they hit their guidance and a shareholder wants at least a 100% return on his money after 12 MORE months, he should not be buying above .005...When the sell off happens after the divy and pps drops to .001 - .003 again longs can load if they are so inclined for 2010...

Basically ETC was a tool for a P&D this year...over a year in production at the time it was announced and 5 months for it to be spun off after insider finished converting to common a couple weeks before the IHub IRP momo run???....

NOW its ETC divy, run EXPH, run....eeeeesh....whats real? indicators say more shares than known being put out and so called fins do not address this, nor do filings...no recovery in accum, OBV continues to drop...

The only FUD mentioned is from those that have ridden pinks before and learned their lessons....IMO....

Its too bad EXPO is real....I wonder what the consensus would be if EXPO was not a viable company....Those at the meeting are on the hook now for portraying EXPO as real....video of EXPO makes it appear real....

Good consulting for CEO has to tell him to say screw EXPH this way...weeeeeeeeeeee right longs? I mean, who actually invests in pinks? no one....thanks for proving that right again....

[P K G]

Not manipulated.

SUPPLY AND DEMAND.

Take some time since you can do only one post and talk to some professionals that know what goes on.

Really be worth your time.