InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 44106
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2006

Re: GamblerNC post# 54595

Sunday, 12/13/2009 3:09:55 PM

Sunday, December 13, 2009 3:09:55 PM

Post# of 103340
"I for one am betting on "ETC" and the "divy" to create demand for EXPH. If EXPH can do the 9-11 million in 2010 that shd give EXPH a pps of .009-.011 without "ETC"."


Wow...basically what I have been saying for almost 6 months now...pps equal to guidance and ETC is the reason given to buy ETC....but I'm the bad guy....

SO, what happens after the divy? EXPH crashes cuz IF they hit their guidance and a shareholder wants at least a 100% return on his money after 12 MORE months, he should not be buying above .005...When the sell off happens after the divy and pps drops to .001 - .003 again longs can load if they are so inclined for 2010...

Basically ETC was a tool for a P&D this year...over a year in production at the time it was announced and 5 months for it to be spun off after insider finished converting to common a couple weeks before the IHub IRP momo run???....

NOW its ETC divy, run EXPH, run....eeeeesh....whats real? indicators say more shares than known being put out and so called fins do not address this, nor do filings...no recovery in accum, OBV continues to drop...

The only FUD mentioned is from those that have ridden pinks before and learned their lessons....IMO....

Its too bad EXPO is real....I wonder what the consensus would be if EXPO was not a viable company....Those at the meeting are on the hook now for portraying EXPO as real....video of EXPO makes it appear real....

Good consulting for CEO has to tell him to say screw EXPH this way...weeeeeeeeeeee right longs? I mean, who actually invests in pinks? no one....thanks for proving that right again....




JMODYODD