Replies to post #279309 on InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[olddog967]

Gungrey: With Mickey it is not only that sometimes he viciously attacks people, which he has done (posts are usually deleted), but his repetitive posts on a subject. During the last few days in at least three posts he brought up the subject of IDCC selling puts as part of a buy back strategy. This is one of his favorite themes going back a while. However, based on the following post which covers a discussion with Janet regarding that subject, it was clearly stated the company could not do that. In today’s post regarding the subject he even stated that he could be wrong, so why keep bringing it up?

Posted by: Thanksformusic Date: Thursday, November 12, 2009 10:24:49 PM
In reply to: dndodd who wrote msg# 277323 Post # 277325 of 279312 [Send a link via email] [Share on Facebook] [Tweet this post]
RE: Janet Pointe’s input

Fwiw, I asked Janet a question today via e-mail and already received a response. I just wanted a simple clarification from some of the comments I’ve read, so I asked her if IDCC could legally sell puts. Her response was succinct--the company and its executives are not allowed to trade options. I doubted it anyway, but it never hurts to confirm.

[rockitt]

Gungrey,

People marks both mean squat. I would bet his ignore count exceeds your little metric. I would have him on ignore, but all of the replys pleading with him to listen to others, to Shut up and get a clue, or just go away, litter this board to the point that the ignore feature is rendered useless.

Looks like I got censored in my previous post about this subject, but please know I think of anyone who honestly takes any of his non-sensical banter to heart really does need to have thier heads examinded.

Sorry, that appears to include you.

JMO,

IDCC will rock in spite of it all.
rockitt