InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

redbudal

12/09/09 7:33 PM

#90965 RE: MoneyMakesMoney #90963

What are you really trying to say?Scam?
icon url

MLR_Lite

12/09/09 7:34 PM

#90966 RE: MoneyMakesMoney #90963

I would say that is unfathomable to me. He has never had a record like that with a company and I doubt seriously that he would start here.

Never mind that his ass would be grass with all of the crackdowns that the SEC has been doing this year.

He has been very responsible about this entire thing, so I reject that concept.
icon url

The Rainmaker

12/09/09 7:47 PM

#90968 RE: MoneyMakesMoney #90963

You have it backwards imho....Why wouldn't they just sell what they could first and then just say the deal fell through sorry....Then no follow up is expected from the company.....deals dead and we're done, sorry. So imho if that was their plan they would have blown out what they could and killed the deal. Then no one would expect anything else to happen. They got away free and clear. By closing the deal, they showed us they are in this for the long haul to build a growing, thriving company not the quick score. Second, your theory would only work if they issued free trading shares not restricted shares. Restricted shares are locked up and would be of no use to a quick getaway artist.
icon url

JC8484

12/09/09 7:58 PM

#90976 RE: MoneyMakesMoney #90963

Remember the PPS was at almost .11 just a few weeks ago and we didn't large dilution at that time. If I was playing the bad guy I'd have sold as much as possible at that time. Plus it only takes the right mix of buy/sell and the price will be there again so why would you dilute at .055 when higher PPS is very doable in the near future.