InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

spider69

10/27/04 3:35 PM

#82667 RE: mschere #82665

sounds good to me...so much positive going on that we seem to missing out on, we need that resolved. Its like giving a bottle of "ripple" to a drunk and telling them they have to wait 3 months to drink it...Come to think of it I may be a IDCCaholic....I think I need treatment, like a NOK/Sam resolution.


icon url

william_wallace

10/27/04 7:46 PM

#82676 RE: mschere #82665

Nokia is a licensee, but we can't take for granted that the panel will definitely agree with us - that the S/E contract is a trigger for the rate in the Nokia/IDC contract. Panel may rule that Nokia and IDCC have a valid contract, but that no rate can be established at this point. At this point, Nokia (and the majority of the investment community)think that is exactly what the panel will say. If Nokia thought the panel would rule that S/E is a trigger - they would have settled by now. If the investment community was certain the panel would rule S/E was a trigger, we'd be trading in the $50 to $80 range right now.

That's the great thing about this investment - the risk. Risk and uncertainty make this an attractive investment. If you understand the company and growth potential and have the balls to invest (some would say speculate) and not sell when other, risk adverse investors are selling, you stand to make a truck load of money - that is, if we're right.