InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

hangdog

10/02/09 12:19 PM

#187289 RE: success622 #187283

Success, you are always on the ball. Glad to see you are leading again in the PACER race. Clawmann is fast, but you are faster. Thanks.
icon url

clawmann

10/02/09 12:20 PM

#187292 RE: success622 #187283

I read it. Interesting. A joint motion signed by both parties. Received by the judge on the 25th. But only signed yesterday. And it appears on Pacer today. I imagine the judge wanted to talk to both parties' lawyers before signing off on another extension. That to me seems to be the reason why this took so long to appear. And, in line with that thought, the conversation looks to have occurred yesterday.

The new doc (which is already one week old) says that the parties were "too optimistic in how long the process would take." So they need two weeks more. OK. So now the next round of pleadings are due on Oct 9.

And we now know that these "faxed" motions can take up to one full week to show up on Pacer.

This is becoming a little bit like chess. Trying to anticipate the other guy's next move (or two or three).






icon url

cjzak

10/02/09 4:07 PM

#187342 RE: success622 #187283

Good to see Success. Thanks for the update! Cj
icon url

HawkPilot

10/02/09 4:20 PM

#187345 RE: success622 #187283

"Other Deadlines"...does any one know what these "other deadlines" not being affected are?