So, as I understand it... a "third party" spent thousands of dollars and the company gave away over a billion shares this past week to promote SMWF. The activity we've seen, in your opinion, is massive dumping at .0001 and not Seamless buying back their shares, even though Seamless released news in the past announcing a share buyback program.
My question is, if the goal is simply to dump at .0001, couldn't they (whoever "they" are), have done that without spending the money or Seamless giving away the shares?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
