InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,614.15
(
0.67%
)
US TECH 100
20,063.60
(
0.77%
)
Dow Jones
39,507.48
(
0.55%
)
Brent Oil
84.80
(
0.12%
)
Bitcoin
57,657.86
(
-0.62%
)
Post# of 26430
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Double-Down

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 22
Posts 1431
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2009

Double-Down

Re: janice shell post# 10535

Monday, 09/28/2009 9:05:39 AM

Monday, September 28, 2009 9:05:39 AM

Post# of 26430
So, as I understand it... a "third party" spent thousands of dollars and the company gave away over a billion shares this past week to promote SMWF. The activity we've seen, in your opinion, is massive dumping at .0001 and not Seamless buying back their shares, even though Seamless released news in the past announcing a share buyback program.

My question is, if the goal is simply to dump at .0001, couldn't they (whoever "they" are), have done that without spending the money or Seamless giving away the shares?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up