InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

deejaesnafu

08/25/09 9:57 AM

#88796 RE: nursejeff #88794

would that even be close to legal?
..aren't they in enough trouble?
icon url

marayatano

08/25/09 10:01 AM

#88798 RE: nursejeff #88794

As you may or may know, there is a restriction as to how much an entitiy may maintain ownership of certain Wamu securities in order to loack in net operating losses. That said, the restriction is approx. 4.xx% of the the outstanding shares.

IMO, JPM may already have their fill or nearly have their fill if they are using JPM subsidiaries or affiliates to accumulate just under the max percentage w/o having to petition the court for approval of exceeding ownership.

Bottom line: JPM would not care who profits from WMI so long as he has his max possible fill, which will limit how much money comes out of JPM, if they have to cough up a portion of the "settlement" or if it goes to litigation. So the PPS can move anywhere at this point. It is up to the demand and the MMs.

IMO, of course.
icon url

climberprof

08/25/09 10:24 AM

#88803 RE: nursejeff #88794

Nursejeff

That does not make sense because JPM or anyone else is allowed to buy upto %5 (or close to that). They cannot buy a lot of shares right now.

I also do not believe that they cannot have their allies buy a lot of WMI stock either since with the Discovery rule at the hand of WMI they currently have to provide documentation requested by WMI.

IMO.

Best
Climber