Replies to post #87439 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[sunshinevibrations]

How accurate is that site? The number never seems to change. Is it a monthly, or what?

[newt69]

brad: refering to your post about the percentage of shorts i noticed where it said institional ownership of shares was .50% . this cant be right , thats not that many shares from what i have been reading earlier about how many shares institutions own. unless i dont understand what is meant by institutional ownership. can someone explain why it only says .50 institutional ownership? Washington Mutual Inc. $ 0.10
WAMUQ 0.00

Short Interest (Shares Short) 55,844,500
Days To Cover (Short Interest Ratio) 9.0
Short Percent of Float 3.80 %
Short Interest - Prior 55,935,600
Short % Increase / Decrease -0.16 %
Short Squeeze Ranking™

% From 52-Wk High ($ 0.42 ) -320.00 %
% From 52-Wk Low ($ 0.01 ) 86.00 %
% From 200-Day MA ($ 0.07 ) 30.00 %
% From 50-Day MA ($ 0.09 ) 10.00 %
Price % Change (52-Week) %

Shares Float 1,470,000,000
Total Shares Outstanding 1,705,359,302
% Owned by Insiders 13.65 %
% Owned by Institutions 0.50 %
Market Cap. $ 170,535,930
Trading Volume - Today 4,930,730
Trading Volume - Average 6,182,600
Trading Volume - Today vs. Average 79.75 %
Earnings Per Share -9.89
PE Ratio
Record Date

[waltczyk]

someone stated that the short interest in a stock does not show any naked shorts, which would make the amount of shorts a greater number

i disagree given the mechanics of calculating the actual short position

i am not saying their is no naked short in this stock as i have no clue i am just saying its already accounted for in the number

normally i would never consider a Naked short arguement but i have read a bit on what happened to Lehman and it is plausible for wamuq given paulson refused to put them on the short protective list

i can't understand why they haven't covered yet except for the most obvious reason but that gets discounted by the way the court case is going in a positive way