i told sneaky they looked photoshopped too (not on ihub), but the point is, i didn't use that to try to discredit him or the company. it looks photoshopped, and per your picture that you found, that seals the deal that it was (so good job on that).
it seems to me like you try to demean sneaky at any chance you get...he does good work. he finds stuff before any of us and digs deep. has he been wrong? yes...but was he expected to have seen the economic downturn and what it would do to production/shipping/business?? i'd give a little wiggle room for some error at least.
but the fact remains that they WERE from the company in some form or another. i doubt they are finished advertisement products (probably just "ideas" that they are trademarking for use in the future)... which would make sense given the huge white circle on the second "advertisement" that is obviously missing something...
PS: none of the "longs" are selling shares....and no one in the company is selling shares...