Can't argue with your reasoning. I've been in invested in IDCC about as long as you. The no violation doesn't scare me. I figured the staff would b/c remember last year up until a few days before the trial NOK and SAM were consolidated and the staff submitted his report before the judge deconsolidated it so im sure if NOK was couple with SAM back in July the staff would have said no violation for both. Either way SAM decided to settle for 400 million. We can argue all day about who got the better deal but I don't believe SAM would have forked over 400 million if it thought the ALJ would have ruled no violation. Obviously SAM is a huge company and 400 million to them isn't the same for many other companies but its still a lot of money to shell out, im sure if SAM thought it won at the ITC they would have went to decision. I have definitely realigned my expectations for IDCC over the years but I still believe a $50-$75 shareprice is attainable over the next 1-2 years. But I see you point as well. Just remember we only got 11 weeks to wait and find out.
TheGame, thank you for taking the time to explain your IDCC experience over nearly 10 years. You won't see many posters being so bold as they would have to be prepared to be called an impostor or worse for expressing their opinion. Jim now refers to them as "IHUB police" so I guess we won't see much change in the future. In my opinion, he is partial to certain posters who may not post much of substance concerning IDCC but are tolerated. It seems any display of emotion on this board whether it be good or bad is questioned/attacked by the few homesteaders and vigalent protectors of what I'm not sure.
I wish you good luck in your investing career. You are young and informed so you have plenty of time to execute and follow your investment plan.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
