Replies to post #18607 on BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[HALF FULL GLASS]

Gold,
The first correct answer in
not"None". The correct answer and thankfully so is that Recaf detected both the lung and colon cancers.

An inconclusive biopsy would be a wait and see on the prostate.

Following the colonoscopy and polyp removal you failed to give your patient a follow up recaf which would have shown the remaining cancer still present being the lung cancer.

What happened to the pet scan. Did you intentionally omit that test?

Now look at this same person with no initial Recaf test. He still has colon and lung cancer. Is he in better condition just because he does not know they exist until symtoms begin to show up?

[opportunityknocking]

A pregnancy test tells you whether you are pregnant or not, correct? Now does it tell you if it is a boy or a girl? Does it tell you that he or she will have two legs and two arms? Will he or she have 10 fingers and 10 toes? Does it have normal brain function or a normal heart rhythm?

The pregnancy test is one tool. It answers the FIRST of many follow up questions. Am I pregnant? Yes or No? If yes, then other tools are added to aid the doctor. If no then there is no need for additional tools.

Again, sorry for those of us that get it. I must make the point clear, so I say it again.

Recaf is one tool.

It answers the first of MANY follow up questions. Do I have cancer? Yes or No?
It is ONE TOOL...................NOT THE ONLY TOOL. Please stop saying that it has to have all of the answers to many questions when the doctor is asking ONE QUESTION.

That is the problem when you don't actually practice medicine, but portray yourself as an experienced physician.

You are telling the medical community how to diagnose cancer when you have never attended a single day in medical school. How can you be advising investors of which many have medical degrees such as myself and understand why recaf is so important to modern medicine. That is not a jab at Goldseeker, I am only stating a fact....he holds no medical degree.

Recaf has multiple applications and will be just one of many tools in the doctor's armamentarium for early diagnosis.

Last point. Are you saying that if I have to prescribe more than one medication to cure an illness that because you have to take multiple medications you would refuse? You want one pill that cures everything. That is what you say when you say that after you take a recaf test there may be other tests required, so it is worthless. Then a mammogram is worthless. Right now in the present tense Recaf is the best FIRST TOOL.

[opportunityknocking]

Head to head. recaf vs. anything to date.

No answer.

Silence is a great answer. It is the only correct answer. Have a little more respect for what Biocurex has accomplished

There are no better markers to date.

[TheBocx]

1) <The bocx stated: "Please explain to all of us how an amendment signed in 2009 prevented Dr. Moro from selling in 2007 and 2008..."

Isn't that the reason you gave for Moro drawing a salary in 2007 and 2008? You should decide which is correct.>

No, and please stop putting your words in my mouth; they have a peculiar taste.

All I said is that if Moro did not sell any shares and he does not have another source of income, he would have to get cash to pay his bills. I also think that it is not excessive that the inventor, founder and CEO of an OTC company gets $110K in cash and $150K in options that he cannot exercise, particularly when one considers that he has not sold stock in over 2 years.

All that said, let us get back to my question, which you are unsuccessfully trying to avoid. You stated:

<it is just something the bocx posted but it would certainly account for no stock sales by management in 2007 and 2008.>

Again, please explain to all of us how an amendment signed in 2009 prevented Dr. Moro from selling in 2007 and 2008...