InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 3535
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/15/2005

Re: Gold Seeker post# 18607

Thursday, 04/09/2009 8:36:40 PM

Thursday, April 09, 2009 8:36:40 PM

Post# of 30387
Gold,
The first correct answer in
not"None". The correct answer and thankfully so is that Recaf detected both the lung and colon cancers.

An inconclusive biopsy would be a wait and see on the prostate.

Following the colonoscopy and polyp removal you failed to give your patient a follow up recaf which would have shown the remaining cancer still present being the lung cancer.

What happened to the pet scan. Did you intentionally omit that test?

Now look at this same person with no initial Recaf test. He still has colon and lung cancer. Is he in better condition just because he does not know they exist until symtoms begin to show up?
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.