"frogdreaming,"
That isn't the case, at all. Firstly, as PL1 reported, he saw them recently (Sarah and a lab worker, anyway,) at DNAG HQ. That was much more recently than "months." Secondly, the caller was not seeking information, but was merely trying to deceive and frighten me out of my shares.
When the caller, in a very unconvincing tone, claimed to "represent an investment group," _and_ in the same breath, claimed to be DNAG's "landlord," any presumed/possible credibility he may have had, at the beginning of the phone call, was gone. His persisting in trying to scare me, repeating himself and essentially pleading for a scare, just drove more nails into the coffin of his nonexistent credibility. The caller was obviously irked that his scare was obviously not working. Also, the entire pretext for his phone call to me, was laughable. The whole phone call was very transparent.
Daniel