InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SPIN

05/21/04 12:01 PM

#41738 RE: Mighunter #41725

Mig - do you have any theories as to why Wave's lawyers would move for an extension "up to and including May 15, 2004" & then not file any answer, motion or other response?

it's fair to say that Wave's lawyers have their hands full -- it's apparently 2 lawyers versus about 40+ & they have to litigate on multiple fronts (not to mention compliance w/the formal SEC investigation). but it would seem that blowing the deadline to answer could possibly result in a viable motion for default judgment from the Sousa camp.

i'm completely shocked that they didn't respond w/in the timeframe they requested from J. Ponsor.

wonder if they are being paid for their services promptly?