InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,522.30
(
1.58%
)
US TECH 100
19,012.80
(
3.89%
)
Dow Jones
40,842.79
(
0.24%
)
Brent Oil
81.45
(
-0.08%
)
Bitcoin
64,505.17
(
-0.15%
)
Post# of 249312
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

SPIN

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

SPIN

Re: Mighunter post# 41725

Friday, 05/21/2004 12:01:25 PM

Friday, May 21, 2004 12:01:25 PM

Post# of 249312
Mig - do you have any theories as to why Wave's lawyers would move for an extension "up to and including May 15, 2004" & then not file any answer, motion or other response?

it's fair to say that Wave's lawyers have their hands full -- it's apparently 2 lawyers versus about 40+ & they have to litigate on multiple fronts (not to mention compliance w/the formal SEC investigation). but it would seem that blowing the deadline to answer could possibly result in a viable motion for default judgment from the Sousa camp.

i'm completely shocked that they didn't respond w/in the timeframe they requested from J. Ponsor.

wonder if they are being paid for their services promptly?

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up