Revlis, I'm sorry but I wasn't clear in my post.
The collecting of royalties I meant to refer to was royalty obligations from other manufacturers, aside from SPRD, selling TD-SCDMA products. IMO, for IDCC, this would especially be true concerning manufacturers such as NOK and Samsung, Sony-Ericson. Additional, how does this position IDCC against Q and it's demands for IPR payment in China? Would they not have to either pay royalties themselves for any of this "homegrown" technology or cross license? What do you think are the chances that this "homegrown" technology will be accepted into the TD-SCDMA standard? Hmmnn? Does this not fit right into what appears to be China's strategy to avoid paying IPR?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
