InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

greg s

04/25/04 7:38 PM

#38887 RE: Snackman #38886

re: "Wave had been associated with that award to the tune of a $5.7 million contract. Fact, not fiction... look it up."

I sure cannot find this "dot", don't know about digging holes, though.
icon url

SPIN

04/25/04 8:33 PM

#38891 RE: Snackman #38886

I don't see where I wrote that Wave is/was trying to 'hype' the stock.

I wrote that Wave needed to hype the stock in order to float $25M worth of shares (assuming of course that the SEC eventually approves the application). maybe a subtle semantic difference... maybe not?

SO Snack, you consider my challenge of a claim that Wave has a $5.7M K as hole digging?

please show me something that supports this claim.

if it exists, $5.7M in revs would certainly be good news for Wave, wouldn't it?

if there is nothing to support this claim which at this moment seems to be little more than conjecture, it's merely another day w/the status quo.

not unlike the slog of obtaining DOD approval for the secure signature stuff?

sorry that my reluctance to trust anything Wave makes you sad... IMO it is completely irrational to extend so much trust to a company with a track record such as Wave's.

to each their own i s'pose...

icon url

rachelelise

04/25/04 9:51 PM

#38901 RE: Snackman #38886

snackman

While I agree that Spin has dug himself a black hole, I also don't know what Scorpio is alluding to with regard to the NG award. I do believe Wave and NG are collaborating but am not aware of any public evidence as to a contract with a monetary amount specified.