Thanks, that's where I thought those "documents" came from. And since according to the SEC, Joe M is a master at manufacturing "fake" documents, every single document that was on his website is now suspect. Thanks for the clarification.
as an authentic document, does it not represent the insurance company's side of the story in order to back up a position they may have wished to take with respect to limiting their liabilities? Wouldn't you wish to hear the other side of the story before using it in the way you have, or don't you care about that?"
pokestake, have you read the entire document? In case you haven't, here it is:
pokestake, I have read the entire document and, based upon what is there -- the time sequence(s) and (mis)statements appear clear -- it is my "opinion" that Lienwand, among others, intentionally lied/misrepresented in the mentioned insurance application.
pokestake, regarding Monterosso, I could care less what happens to him. If he is guilty then they should fine/penalize him as much as possible. If he is found guilty and the DOJ is involved then I would have no problem with prison time. If guilty then Monterosso should pay the piper.
But, does being guilty of what he is charged with make everything he says untrue? -- I don't think so.
Does being guilty of what he is charged with make everything -- all documents and records he possesses false? -- I don't think so.
I think, my "opinion", that there is much much more yet to see the light of day and I believe that there will be many more Officers, managers, Directors who will, in the relatively near future, have charges levied against them and have to face the bar of justice.
I hope each and every one of them pays the piper to the fullest extent.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
